Article by Kevin J. Weiland, MD, FACP

Close Window   

 


Screening, Early Detection the Key to Colon Cancer Prevention

In the fight against colon cancer we seem to have turned the corner. For the first time we have seen a small but steady decline in cancer rates. These improvements have resulted from advances in cancer prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment. Your primary care physician plays an active role in this fight. 

Colon cancer is our nation’s second-leading cause of cancer death. It strikes an estimated 135,000 Americans each year, causing death for 55,000 people. Tragically, for many patients, a delay in diagnosis is the primary reason for the advance stage of the disease at presentation and is associated with a poor outcome. Regular screening could have detected many of these cancers at an earlier, more favorable stage.

It is not appreciated by the public, but colon cancer is the only major cancer that affects men and women almost equally. There appears to be a misconception that it affects mainly men. Women need to realize that they are equally at risk, and that they need to undergo screening for it just as they need to be screened for breast and cervical cancer.  

Screening is particularly valuable in the case of colon cancer because the disease is readily detected and in its early stages is highly treatable. When diagnosed before the onset of symptoms, perhaps 85% of colon cancers are localized to the bowel and can be cured by surgical excision. Once symptoms have developed, the majority of the cancers have spread beyond the bowel and the likelihood of surgical cure is only 30% to 40%.

Colon cancer is rare in persons under age 40. Between ages 40 and 50 the incidence increases slightly; after age 50 the incidence begins to rise substantially. For that reason, it is recommended that screening for colon cancer start at age 50.  

A fair amount of colon cancer cases occur in families and appear to involve inherited risk. The greater the number of first-degree family members (parents, siblings, or children) who have had colon polyps or cancer, and the younger the age at diagnosis, the more likely it is that the patient has a genetic predisposition to develop colon cancer. Instead of screening, patients with a family history of the cancer should undergo a complete colonoscopic evaluation of the colon..

Screening for colon cancer is appropriate only in patients without symptoms; symptomatic patient clearly require more intensive evaluation. The principal early symptoms of colon cancer are abdominal pain or cramping, a change in bowel movement pattern lasting more than a few weeks, and rectal bleeding. 

At times, the occurrence of rectal bleeding can pose a clinical dilemma. The safest approach is to perform an evaluation for cancer in a patient old enough to be a risk if the bleeding occurs more than once or persists after hemorrhoid treatment, or if the blood appears to be mixed with the stool. The latter finding indicates that the bleeding probably originates higher in the bowel.

The screening tests currently recommended for men and women aged 50 or older without symptoms and with no other risk factors are--to detect blood in the stool (fecal occult blood test) every year, and a flexible sigmoidoscopy every five years. Sigmoidoscopy is the visual examination of the inside of the rectum and sigmoid colon. The colon (large intestine) is 5 to 6 feet long.  The flexible sigmoidoscopy has proved to be accurate for diagnosing polyps and cancer in the distal one third of the colon, the area where 60% to 70% of the cancers and colon polyps occur.  If either the sigmoidoscopy is abnormal or there is blood in the stool, patients are often refereed to a specialist who will perform a full colonoscopic evaluation of the colon.

The alternative to a colonoscopy is the barium enema and x-ray study, plus a sigmoidoscopy if the patient has not already undergone the latter. If these test results suggest the possibility of cancer, the patient must then undergo colonoscopy anyway. Thus, the barium study is not necessarily a cheaper test: when the need for additional colonoscopies is factored in.

Physicians are encouraged to talk with their patients about the prevalence of colon cancer, risk factors, and the importance of screening for colon cancer. Health plans and employers also have a vested interest in improving screening rates if they are truly committed to maintaining employee health. Reducing the incidence and mortality of colon cancer is a realistic goal. To achieve this, however, we must find incentives and innovative ways to encourage people to participate in this life saving screening process.

Content of articles can only be used with writer attribution to Dr. Kevin Weiland.
 


 

 

©2006 The Dakota Diet, Dr. Kevin Weiland